Position And Role Of Tradition In Exegesis Of Al-Rahman

Maryam Ghorbani

Mohammad Jawad is a blaspheme of the famous and contemporary Shi'ite scholars and commentators who have written an interpretation called Ala al-Rahman, in the interpretation of al-Qur'ān. The dominant approach is the rational ijtihadi approach interpreter, but the use of narrations in the interpretation of al-'Arrahman is significant. The rhetoric in understanding the verses of Allah and the verses related to the people of the Book has brought most of the narrations. In this study, we have examined the application of narratives in the interpretation of al-'Arrahman and, while expressing the abundance of narratives in this interpretation, we have first shown that the narrator narrates more than the infallibles (a)

Secondly, we have defined the subject and frequency of narration, including jurisprudence, verbal, and moralistic. Indeed, we have stated that the narrator has confirmed the narration and used it as an interpretation, and which narratives have been criticized by text and scripture. Tradition is one of the most important interpretative factors that are considered by interpreters after the Holy Qur'an. The clergy have also taken the most from the tradition as a great commentator in its interpretation.