The Hadith-Based Commentary in Nemooneh & Atyab al-bayan Commentaries of Quran, A Comparative Study

Fatemeh Bahrololoomi

various interpretive methods have been common with the Qur'an's revelation so far and the oldest of them is a narrative method based on the words of the Prophet and his family. Over time, new methods and trends have emerged in the interpretation of the Qur'an. The interpretation of the Qur'an is by no means needless of traditions because most methods of interpretation are rooted in traditions. But in modern interpretations with a modern-social view, fewer traditions are used therefore, we decided to collect and then analyze the data and compare the place of narrations in two contemporary interpretations and after studying the aspects of the method and their approach and exploring the narratives and the basis of their selection by the commentators, we find that the interpretation of the Nemoone and the Atyab al-bayan in the common theological approach and the narrative use of both are often to prove the theological beliefs of the Imamiyyah except that Ayatollah Makarem Shirazi, unlike Ayatollah Tayyeb, does not insist on the absolute use of Shiite sources and traditions And in other words, their approach to applying tradition is unlike Ayatollah Tayyeb that is to say, using Sunni sources and narratives to show the convergence of the two religions. This is quite evident from the accuracy of the narration of Atyab al-Bayan in the following verses, especially the verses containing theological discussions