Theses
Supervised Thesis of Ph.D Students
|
No |
Name |
Date |
Title |
|
1 |
|
|
A Review of the Discourse of Manuscripts and Its Critique Among the Earlier and the Modern. |
|
2 |
|
|
Investigating and Analyzing the Frequency of the Use of Archaicin the 30th Chapter of Holy Qur'an Versus Its Other Components. |
|
3 |
|
|
The Methodology of the Qur'an's Thematic Interpretation and the Presentation of aNew Definition of It. |
|
4 |
|
|
An Analysis of the Dilemmas and Abilities Associated with the HumanActivities of ImamAli (AS) with the Nahj-Al-Balaghah. |
|
5 |
|
|
Reviewing theValidation Bases of BayanAl-Anwar. |
|
6 |
|
|
An Analytic Study of the Difference in the Commentary Approach in Interpreting Heavenly Verses. |
|
7 |
|
|
An Analysis of the Approach and the Fields of Rationalism in the Context of the Interpretati on of Qur'an. |
|
8 |
|
|
Motivation and Narratives of the Specificity of the Language of the Qur'an. |
Supervised Thesis of M.A Students
|
No |
Name |
Date |
Title |
|
1 |
|
|
An Analytic Study of Moghiani's Interpretative Method intheAl-Kashef. |
|
2 |
|
|
Research in the Interpretative Method of Al-KashfandAl-Bayan. |
|
3 |
|
|
A Comparative Study of the Views of SheikhTusi and Tabarsei in Some Types of Qur'anic Sciences. |
|
4 |
|
|
Review of the Views of AbuAl-Fotouh razi in Qur'anic Sciences and Its Effect on the Interpretation of Qur'anic Verses. |
|
5 |
|
|
Examining the Ayatullah Javadi Amoli's Interpretative Method in Tasnim. |
|
6 |
|
|
A Comparative Study of Shiite and Sunni Narrations and the Old Testament in the Interpretation of Surah Yusuf. |
|
7 |
|
|
The Methodology of the Book Al-Tafsir Al-A'thari Al-Jame. |
|
8 |
|
|
Examining Origins from the Viewpoint of Muslim Commentators. |
|
9 |
|
|
A Comparative Study of the Arguments of the Supporters and Opponents of the Appropriateness and Unity of the Verses and Forms. |
|
10 |
|
|
A Comparative Study of the Literary Approach of the Majma' Al-Bayan and RawzAl-Jananan with Emphasis on Lexical Aspects. |
|
11 |
|
|
A Comparative Study of Modern Interpretation by the Partowi of the Holy Qur'an. |
|
12 |
|
|
Influence of Verbal Topics of the Fifth Century in the Tebyan Interpretation. |
|
13 |
|
|
A Comparative Study of the Methodology of Al-Fotouh Razi Interpretation and Comment aryby Mullah Fathollah Kashani. |
|
14 |
|
|
A comparative Comparison of the Position of Reason in the Farighein Traditions. |
|
15 |
|
|
Analytical Review of the Narrative Traditions of Imam Reza (AS). |
|
16 |
|
|
Methodology of Allameh Askari in the Caliphate Narrative Critique. |
|
17 |
|
|
Questioning Culture in the Speech and Behavior of the Infallible. |
|
18 |
|
|
Hadith Position in Kashf Al-Asrar. |
|
19 |
|
|
Analytical and Textual Analysis of the Interpretation of Hussein Ibn Hakam Heabari. |
|
20 |
|
|
The Typology of the Interpretive School of Imam Sajjad(AS) with the Emphasison Modern Era. |
|
21 |
|
|
Analytical Review of the Principles of Imam Shafei with Emphasis on the Topics of the Verses of Al-Ahkamand Its Effect on the Next Commentators. |
|
22 |
|
|
Methodology for the Interpretation of Sulamy. |
|
23 |
|
|
Analytical Review of the Positions of the Imams Against the Flow of the Hadith. |
|
24 |
|
|
The Intellectual-Theological Movements of the Era of Imam Sadiq(AS). |