| Authors | مهدی سلیمانی مطلق,هدی قاسمیه,علی طالبی,خدایار عبداللهی |
| Journal | WATER RESOUR MANAG |
| Page number | 109 |
| Volume number | 31 |
| IF | 2.437 |
| Paper Type | Full Paper |
| Published At | 2017-01-11 |
| Journal Grade | Scientific - research |
| Journal Type | Electronic |
| Journal Country | Iran, Islamic Republic Of |
| Journal Index | ISI ,SCOPUS |
| Keywords | Hydraulic diffusivity. Groundwater drought . Propagation drought . SGI index |
|---|
Abstract
Analysis of the characteristics and propagation behaviors of groundwater drought at
different aquifer sites during past and future periods needs a proper understanding regarding its
relation with meteorological droughts. Use of a robust technique of modeling (stochastic
models) allowed groundwater level and precipitation to be forecasted and then the droughts
were computed and analyzed using Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). In this research,
Aleshtar Plain was selected as a case study. Analysis in this region was carried out by hierarchy
and K-means clustering (5 clusters), because of the regional investigation of groundwater
drought and large number of boreholes. The performance results of models showed that best
forecasting models in cluster 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were Auto-Regressive (AR)(1), AR(2), Moving
Average (MA)(2), Mixed Autoregressive–Moving Average (ARMA)(2,2) and AR(2), respectively. Furthermore, the most appropriate model for precipitation within the study plain was
ARMA(1, 2). Investigation of the relationship between meteorological and groundwater
drought indicated that the strongest correlation between two types of droughts was for clusters
4 and 1 with a correlation coefficient of 0.76 and 0.63, respectively. Also, the lowest
correlation was for cluster 2 with a correlation coefficient of 0.51. The results of cumulative
periods related to the maximum correlation between SPI and Standardized Groundwater Level
Index (SGI) showed that clusters 1 to 3 corresponded with cumulative 24-month periods of
SPI and this magnitude for clusters 4 and 5 were 18 and 12 months, respectively. Moreover,
results of maximum drought severity showed there was low variability between clusters
considering the extreme droughts (SGI ≤ −2) during the study period. For the future period,
Water Resour Manage
DOI 10.1007/s11269-016-1513-5
* Hoda Ghasemieh
h.ghasemieh@kashanu.ac.ir
1
Department of Watershed and Range Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences,
University of Kashan, Kashan City, Iran
2
Department of Watershed and Range Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Desert,
University of Yazd, Yazd City, Iran
3
Department of Watershed and Range Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences,
Shahrekord University, Shahrekord City, Iran
Author's personal copy
drought severity results showed that groundwater drought of 2019 may happen with moderate
value in cluster 5, severe values in clusters 2, 1 and 4, respectively, and extreme value in cluster
3. Hydrogeological evidence of the sites and results of autocorrelation structure of SGI series
confirmed the time taken by meteorological drought for propagation into groundwater.
Furthermore, results showed that the aquifer is controlled more by hydraulic diffusivity factor.
so it would be expected that drought propagation time into groundwater would be long for the
Western part and relatively short for sites located in the East, South tending to center and
partially north of the aquifer. In general, these results represent an early warning system for
groundwater drought preparation and mitigation of its impacts in a future time.