CV


FA
Hoda Ghasemieh

Hoda Ghasemieh

Associate Professor

Full-Time Faculty Member

College: Faculty of Natural Resrources and Earth Sciences

Department: Range and Watershed Management

Degree: Ph.D

CV
FA
Hoda Ghasemieh

Associate Professor Hoda Ghasemieh

Full-Time Faculty Member
College: Faculty of Natural Resrources and Earth Sciences - Department: Range and Watershed Management Degree: Ph.D |

Identification and Analysis of Drought Propagation of Groundwater During Past and Future Periods

Authorsمهدی سلیمانی مطلق,هدی قاسمیه,علی طالبی,خدایار عبداللهی
JournalWATER RESOUR MANAG
Page number109
Volume number31
IF2.437
Paper TypeFull Paper
Published At2017-01-11
Journal GradeScientific - research
Journal TypeElectronic
Journal CountryIran, Islamic Republic Of
Journal IndexISI ,SCOPUS
KeywordsHydraulic diffusivity. Groundwater drought . Propagation drought . SGI index

Abstract

Analysis of the characteristics and propagation behaviors of groundwater drought at different aquifer sites during past and future periods needs a proper understanding regarding its relation with meteorological droughts. Use of a robust technique of modeling (stochastic models) allowed groundwater level and precipitation to be forecasted and then the droughts were computed and analyzed using Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). In this research, Aleshtar Plain was selected as a case study. Analysis in this region was carried out by hierarchy and K-means clustering (5 clusters), because of the regional investigation of groundwater drought and large number of boreholes. The performance results of models showed that best forecasting models in cluster 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were Auto-Regressive (AR)(1), AR(2), Moving Average (MA)(2), Mixed Autoregressive–Moving Average (ARMA)(2,2) and AR(2), respectively. Furthermore, the most appropriate model for precipitation within the study plain was ARMA(1, 2). Investigation of the relationship between meteorological and groundwater drought indicated that the strongest correlation between two types of droughts was for clusters 4 and 1 with a correlation coefficient of 0.76 and 0.63, respectively. Also, the lowest correlation was for cluster 2 with a correlation coefficient of 0.51. The results of cumulative periods related to the maximum correlation between SPI and Standardized Groundwater Level Index (SGI) showed that clusters 1 to 3 corresponded with cumulative 24-month periods of SPI and this magnitude for clusters 4 and 5 were 18 and 12 months, respectively. Moreover, results of maximum drought severity showed there was low variability between clusters considering the extreme droughts (SGI ≤ −2) during the study period. For the future period, Water Resour Manage DOI 10.1007/s11269-016-1513-5 * Hoda Ghasemieh h.ghasemieh@kashanu.ac.ir 1 Department of Watershed and Range Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan City, Iran 2 Department of Watershed and Range Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Desert, University of Yazd, Yazd City, Iran 3 Department of Watershed and Range Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord City, Iran Author's personal copy drought severity results showed that groundwater drought of 2019 may happen with moderate value in cluster 5, severe values in clusters 2, 1 and 4, respectively, and extreme value in cluster 3. Hydrogeological evidence of the sites and results of autocorrelation structure of SGI series confirmed the time taken by meteorological drought for propagation into groundwater. Furthermore, results showed that the aquifer is controlled more by hydraulic diffusivity factor. so it would be expected that drought propagation time into groundwater would be long for the Western part and relatively short for sites located in the East, South tending to center and partially north of the aquifer. In general, these results represent an early warning system for groundwater drought preparation and mitigation of its impacts in a future time.