| نویسندگان | مصطفی صابری,حسین خراسانی زاده,علیرضا آقایی |
| نشریه | Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry |
| شماره صفحات | 1 |
| شماره مجلد | 151 |
| ضریب تاثیر (IF) | ثبت نشده |
| نوع مقاله | Full Paper |
| تاریخ انتشار | 2026-07-11 |
| رتبه نشریه | علمی - پژوهشی |
| نوع نشریه | الکترونیکی |
| کشور محل چاپ | ایران |
| نمایه نشریه | JCR ,SCOPUS |
| کلید واژه ها | Geothermal heat exchanger · Turbulator · Energy · Exergy · Environmental analysis · Economic analysis · Hybrid nanofluid |
|---|
چکیده مقاله
Renewable energy sources are crucial for combating climate change and ensuring sustainable development. Geothermal
energy, in particular, offers a uniquely reliable and continuous power supply, independent of weather conditions, significantly
reducing greenhouse gas emissions while utilizing the Earth’s immense internal heat. In this study, a W-shaped geothermal
heat exchanger with an elliptical cross-section, equipped with perforated conical turbulators and filled with a Cu-SiO₂-
MWCNT/water ternary hybrid nanofluid for the first time, is numerically simulated using CFD. The k-epsilon realizable
turbulence model and mixture model are employed for turbulent and two-phase flow, respectively. This climate study was
carried out assuming a warm arid climate at a depth of 1.5m from the ground. The results obtained from this study show
that by increasing the input speed in the geothermal heat exchanger and the volume fraction of nanoparticles, the thermal
performance and pressure drop increase in all stages of the numerical simulation. Also, the maximum thermal performance
of the geothermal exchanger is when using the turbulator and 3% volume fraction and Reynolds number of 5000. In addition,
the thermal–hydraulic evaluation index is greater than 1 in all cases. Therefore, using a turbulator in a geothermal converter
is desirable in terms of the performance evaluation criteria index. In addition, increasing the Reynolds number and increasing nanofluid volume fraction at the entrance of the geothermal heat exchanger increases the exergy efficiency. Analysis
4E (Energy, exergy, economic and environmental) has been performed for the system. The highest exergy efficiency was
32.34%. The payback period was 6.23 years, levelized cost of energy (LCOE = 0.0856 $ kW−1h−1) and the carbon dioxide
reduction rate was 0.956 tons/year.