رزومه وب سایت شخصی
QR


حسین طالبی قادیکلایی

حسین طالبی قادیکلایی

استادیار

دانشکده: دانشکده مهندسی مکانیک

گروه: مهندسی مکانیک - ساخت و تولید

مقطع تحصیلی: دکتری

رزومه وب سایت شخصی
QR
حسین طالبی قادیکلایی

استادیار حسین طالبی قادیکلایی

دانشکده: دانشکده مهندسی مکانیک - گروه: مهندسی مکانیک - ساخت و تولید مقطع تحصیلی: دکتری |

:Fields of Interest

 Metal Forming processes -

 Ductile Fracture -

 Plasticity -

- Sheet Metal forming (Mechanical and Formability testing, Micro forming, Material anisotropy, Non-linear deformation loading, High strain rate deformation, Hot forming, Finite element modeling) 

 Ductility and Ductile Damage -

Deformation Mechanics -

Fuel cell (Metallic Bipolar plates) -

 Laser Forming -

 Fracture and Mechanical Behavior of Additively Manufactured Product -

 

 

 

 

نمایش بیشتر

Evaluation of constitutive modeling for dynamic Plastic-Fracture modeling of Dual Phase (DP590) steel sheets

نویسندگانفرهاد نجف نیا,حسین طالبی قادیکلائی,امیر حسین بامداد,احسان دورچه پور,رامین هاشمی
نشریهEvaluation of constitutive modeling for dynamic plastic-fracture modeling of dual phase (DP590) steel sheets
شماره صفحات10210
شماره مجلد36
ضریب تاثیر (IF)ثبت نشده
نوع مقالهFull Paper
تاریخ انتشار2025-05-19
رتبه نشریهعلمی - پژوهشی
نوع نشریهالکترونیکی
کشور محل چاپایران
نمایه نشریهJCR ,SCOPUS

چکیده مقاله

This study investigates the dynamic plastic-fracture behavior of Dual Phase (DP590) steel sheets using various constitutive models. To highlight the significance of calibration procedures, three tension tests—uniaxial, notched, and plane strain tensions—are performed based on stress state analysis. Initially, the Johnson-Cook model is calibrated using a hybrid method. Additionally, phenomenological rate-dependent fracture criteria, including Ayada, normalized Cockroft-Latham, Brozzo, and Rice-Tracey are proposed to characterize both quasi-static and dynamic mechanical behavior. Fracture envelopes are developed for each model based on these tests. The calibrated criteria are implemented into the finite element (FE) code Abaqus/Explicit via user subroutines, and numerical simulations are conducted to evaluate the models' accuracy beyond calibration conditions. Results demonstrate that the choice of calibration test significantly influences the damage value, accuracy of rate-dependent models, and fracture envelope. The notched and uniaxial tension tests emerge as the most effective calibration methods, providing predictions with minimal error. Notched tension is particularly reliable, with the Rice-Tracey model showing an error rate of approximately 2.72 %, followed by the Brozzo criterion at 4.38 %. Uniaxial tension slightly increases the error rate, with Ayada and Brozzo models predicting fracture strains with errors between 5 and 7 %. In contrast, the normalized Cockroft-Latham model shows significant errors at higher stress triaxialities, making it less suitable for precise fracture predictions. Plane strain tension is found to be an inappropriate calibration choice for the proposed simple rate-dependent models. In conclusion, the study recommends the Rice-Tracey model calibrated with notched tension tests for reliable dynamic fracture predictions with minimal testing. If only uniaxial tension tests are available, the Rice-Tracey and Brozzo models are suggested. This approach provides valuable insights for accurately predicting the dynamic fracture behavior of DP590 steel, emphasizing the importance of selecting appropriate calibration methods.